When I try to build libX11 or libSM I find similar error messages about an older version of automake 1.10 that they both require and I haven't been able to make either use a newer one.

Details:

7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #1010: Thu May  6 05:36:44 CDT 2010

Ports tree up to date as of this morning.

I started with the oldest of UPDATING that I hadn't done.

201005010:
  AFFECTS: users of security/gnome-keyring
  AUTHOR: k...@freebsd.org

  libgnome-keyring was split out of the gnome-keyring package.  Perform the
  following before doing your normal upgrade steps:

        pkg_delete -f "gnome-keyring-*"
        portmaster security/gnome-keyring

This resulted in libX11 error that follows:

configure.ac:462: the top level
configure.ac:10: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an
configure.ac:10: old Automake version.  You should recreate aclocal.m4
configure.ac:10: with aclocal and run automake again.
/usr/local/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am: am__fastdepCC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL /usr/local/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am: The usual way to define `am__fastdepCC' is to add `AC_PROG_CC' /usr/local/share/automake-1.10/am/depend2.am: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.
*** Error code 63

Stop in /new/usr/local/ports/x11/libX11.

===>>> make failed for x11/libX11
===>>> Aborting update

===>>> Update for libX11-1.2.1_1,1 failed
===>>> Aborting update

===>>> Update for gtk-2.18.7_1 failed
===>>> Aborting update

===>>> Update for gconf2-2.28.0_2 failed===>>> Aborting update

Is anyone else having this problem?

The complete attempt is documented  at http://encontacto.net/INFO/libX11.txt

Any help appreciated. I have pkg_deleted everything that I can think of and tried rebuilding for the last 3 days but with no luck. Maybe I should up date to 8.0.

Thanks,

ed
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to