On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:46 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On May 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Robert Noland <rnol...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Demelier David wrote: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143723 > >> > >> It seems adding CFLAGS+=-march-=native solved the problem but I > >> don't want to > >> keep this flag everytime in my make.conf > >> > >> How this flag could solve the problem ? I can't understand. > > > > This actually stems from libdrm. Intel requires certain atomics that > > are not available on pure i386. They are present in code built for > > i486 > > +. The default cpu was changed to i486 some time . > > Should the port be marked broken with -march=i386 then?
Well, I'm not sure quite how we would do that... but if your kernel/world is not really old, it should just work unless you force gcc to produce code that will run on i386. robert. > -Garrett -- Robert Noland <rnol...@freebsd.org> FreeBSD _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
