On 30 March 2010 09:30, Garrett Cooper <yanef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry -- one last thing to kick around before I get off this topic: > > If this is really slick and tinderbox / whatever tools is doing its > job and no PRs have been reported for X number of days on a given port > (would require tie-ins to GNATS, or whatever), perhaps it would be > nice if ports were automatically `promoted' from HEAD to STABLE? I > mean, why do something if a computer can do it for you, right :)?
No, not really - what if the new port contains a version bump? I don't consider "stable" as in "builds and works" good enough, it really needs to be kept in a sane state with regards to version bumps, shared libs bumps, etc. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
