On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Max Brazhnikov <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/142880; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Max Brazhnikov <m...@freebsd.org> > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, jupeng...@gmail.com, w...@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN --- > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:22:50 +0300 > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T > Content-Type: Text/Plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > What the reason to have the same dictionaries under different ports? Yes, it is the same dictionary. After rethinking of it ， now I think it is unneeded to create a new port for stardict3-dict-zh_CN. > Wouldn 't=20 better to remove run dependency on stardict and allow people > to use existing port for any of stardict 2/3 (or other -- not only stardict > can use these dictionaries.) > Yes, it is better than to create a new port. :) But how do you think about this way: 1 REPOCOPY stardict2-dict-zh_CN--> stardict-dict-zh_CN 2 Add option entry for stardict2 or stardict3 ? wen > > Max > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) > > iEYEABECAAYFAktU3z8ACgkQ+9kIwqyzzRIbugCfX3Clh5ZIwCpDFXE/CAWJ3phd > wK0AoIOjbza+ZXUvOxM+cG/GqSjWr/n0 > =XnNg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T-- > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
