On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
Hi
I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now.
Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be separate from
x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.
This would be the easiest route, but I'm not sure this is the best thing
to do. From user's perspective, one should be able to "cd
category/port" and "make install". The rest (including taking care of
architecture-dependent things) should be handled by underlying
infrastructure. Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.
I tried it with patching your Makefile and distinfo. In Makefile I only
changed DISTVERSION and DISTNAME and commented out ONLY_FOR_ARCHS.
It installs fine and as far as I can see now all is well :-)
This is on 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) from today.
Rainer Hurling
./danfe
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
