On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Dmitry Marakasov<amd...@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to >> > be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to >> > resolve things with SF) as it will be clear which port uses the new >> > scheme and there will be no variety of workarounds. >> >> Perhaps I've lost it in this thread, but is it only a certain amount >> of ports affected? It appears the two SF ports I maintain hiccup a >> bit, but are able to eventually find the distfile. > > This should only affect updating SF ports to new versions. I've checked > your ports, they seem to fetch just fine. >
In that case, do you have GNATS access to close the PR I recently filed because of SF fetch errors[1]? If not, I will post a followup to have it closed. Regards, [1] - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137597 -- Glen Barber _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
