On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:48:09 +0100 Stefan Bethke <s...@lassitu.de> wrote:
>Am 12.03.2009 um 11:29 schrieb Emanuel Haupt: > >>>> $ sudo make >>>> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>>> => bash-4.tar.gz is not in /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo. >>>> => Either /usr/ports/shells/bash/distinfo is out of date, or >>>> => bash-4.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly. >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>> >>>> Stop in /usr/ports/shells/bash. >>> >>> Update: After a recent ports tree update bash now builds correctly >>> here. >> >> The update still remains broken: >> >> [foo...@portjail ~]$ pkg_info >> bash-static-4.0.10_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell >> >> [r...@portjail ~]$ set -x >> [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname) >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected >> token `)' >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: `uname)' > >I also find this rather annoying. I believe that a rather large >percentage of people use bash as their default shell, so moving from >3.2 to 4.0 should have been preceded by a headsup or an entry in >UPDATING. I am having the exact same problem. Several of my scripts are now failing. I have modified a few with the older "`" tic method to make them work; however, I feel that the easiest thing would be to simply revert to Bash-3. Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it an un-squashed bug? -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
