On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 Anonymous <swel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly
> bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents?
>
> %%%
> PORTVERSION= 0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX}
> PORTEPOCH= 1
>
> SNAPSUFFIX= .${SNAPTYPE}.${SNAPREV}
> SNAPTYPE= git
> SNAPREV= e09f50e
> %%%
>
> Where PKGNAME would look like
>
> myport-0.0.10.git.e09f50e,1
>
> I want to keep commit reference in place and refrain from using vague
> dates in PORTVERSION because there can be several commits per day. And
> for curious users I can include ChangeLog file in distfile generated
> from git-log command.
No, please don't do this. We use PORTEPOCH when there's no other way.
Use, like other ports do:
PORTVERSION= 0.0.10
PORTREVISION= ${SNAPDATE}
I don't see what role SNAPTYPE would have.
Since you have the date, you can easily get the git magic string.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
