On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:25 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:47 -0500) ----* > | Problem is, it isn't just the Xserver... All of the pieces are > | intertwined and so in many cases to update Xserver you also need to > | update some/several libraries as well as all of your drivers. Xorg is > | about 60 or 70 ports now. > > That can be handled, it seems to me. > > My current port upgrade problem is that I cannot csup the tree and get > the old X to rebuild dependent components. > > | FWIW, I have Xserver 1.6 and xrandr bits that are rc already... as well > | as a new intel driver that I don't want to update without xserver 1.6. > > I would be willing to test 1.6 on my many different machines, provided > there is a clear and inexpensive (< 2 hours) path to a rollback.
I'll assemble a patch as soon as I can get to it. From where we are now in ports, the only thing that has to be updated that I can think of is the server, then rebuild your drivers. robert. > -- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
