On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:26:19AM -0500, Rick Chisholm wrote: >> I agree. I was thinking if it could be acceptable to add an option to >> the port for installing/not installing the sample blacklists and not >> adding those to the plist anyway. This could be easier to handle. >> Perhaps also more logical. >> >> With this change a note on deinstall to check and remove by hand the >> folder should also be added, obviously. >> >> > That might make more sense, esp. if a user has created numerous large > dbs rather than downloading them from a 3rd party. It wasn't disastrous > for me since I upgraded a test server first, but it would be preferable > if the upgrade didn't touch the db dir or squidGuard.conf.
As I said that was behaviour already present in the port logic. I will make some experiments in this direction and modify the port as needed. Only doubt I have is, how will tinderboxes react to this kind of implementation? -- Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
