Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Colin Percival <cperc...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
This is just a notice that a patch is no longer needed with
textproc/libxml2 -- it appears to have been checked in upstream:
This isn't noted in the CVSweb interface, so I assume the file is
stale. However, it was recently synced (today at ~noon) with portsnap.
Does running 'portsnap extract textproc/libxml2' make the problem
patch go away?
Yes. Is this an issue with the `update' logic?
I suppose that it's possible that there's a bug in the 'portsnap update' logic,
but usually problems like this occur as a result of someone trying to use both
portsnap and cvsup/csup.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve
Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
