* G. Paul Ziemba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In hopes of stimulating some discussion, I propose a new variable,
> LOCAL_PATCHES (or maybe SITE_PATCHES), that would behave just like
> EXTRA_PATCHES, except that it would be designated specifically for
> site-local patches. It would be implemented in the do-patch target
> in bsd.port.mk at the end, after patches from PATCHDIR are applied,
> and patch Makefiles would, by convention, leave it unmolested.
>
> Have I overlooked some better approach to integrating site-local
> fixes?
I am not aware of any mechanism for this. But I agree that it's
really needed. Before (in cvsup times) we could just place patches
under files/ and be happy, but now when more people use portsnap
we need something better.
I think making another variable that behaves like EXTRA_PATCHES is
not convenient - you'll have to provide it per-port which means
conditionals in make.conf.
I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having
a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/patch-*)
or single level ${PORTNAME}/patch-*) and a single variable that makes
port system look there for patches in addition to ${PATCHDIR}.
Thus, you only have to add a single line to make.conf:
USE_LOCALPATCHES= /usr/ports/local-patches
(or /whereever)
and from there on files will be searced in
either /usr/ports/local-patches/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}
/usr/ports/local-patches/${PORTNAME}.
AFAIK, port names are unique in the whole portstree, so single level
layout seems to be easier to handle.
Here's the draft patch for this functionality:
http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/local-patchdir.patch
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..: jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.amdmi3.ru
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
