On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > All, > > Note: I'm not currently subscribed to ports@, please cc: me on replies. > > I was wondering what peoples' thoughts are on a "reconfig-recursive" > target for ports? Basically, the same as config-recursive, but instead > of using config-conditional for each dependency, it would use config. > This might be useful for someone who wants to review dependecies' > options and/or make changes, but without having to manually iterate > through them or rmconfig-recursive first. > > I figured this might come in handy. Thoughts?
Seems like a rare case where someone would want to re-visit (in this manner) options they have already set. That said, it may come in handy. I think "config-recursive-unconditional" would be a better name as it fits better with the "config-recursive" target. Of course, this is just a bikeshed argument so I don't care what it ends up being called. ;) -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
