Hello! Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: |> I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to |> fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t. | I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding | the pointer. size_t is only required to hold result of sizeof. size_t is required to be of rank equal to or greater than any other object you can create from within the C language. This implies that it can (i.e., it is required to be able to) hold a pointer type.
Does it? http://bytes.com/forum/thread735346.html /fjoe _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
