On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:23:00 -0500, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:18:25 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> And how are updates tested - except when you hijack pointyhat :) ?

I think, most of us don't test it until pointyhat complain it. ;-) It's

 :-D

very rare for *-reference ports to change with PORTDOCS=* unless they
added something like sometime ago doxygen/devhelp were added in
glibmm-reference and we got pointyhat error log for that. Well, also got
your error log for different case in same port.

If I modify or rewrite reference framework, I would use static plist
instead of PORTDOCS=* and remove NOPORTDOCS option. It means that we will have to test *-reference ports' plist at the each update. I don't know if
my team will like it, so I will have to ask if I am going to touch
reference framework (don't have time for that right now).

Not using PORTDOCS and not supporting NOPORTDOCS are different things, no?

The reference framework has PORTDOCS=* and define NOPORTDOCS in post-install target. So, I mean by not use PORTDOCS (auto with/without @comment in plist) for avoid plist broke if users use NOPORTDOCS when remove NOPORTDOCS from post-install target. And don't use NOPORTDOCS in Makefile, so it will be always install. Also, I usually like to avoid use PORTDOCS for I can add more lines in static plist.

On my desktop /usr/local/shre/docs is about 400MB.
I had to fit recently a pretty complex system on a small thingy. Had to
go in and remove a lot of things by hand o have place for the base
system and the port plus for some data.

The *-reference ports only install documents stuff, so it doesn't make any sense to provide NOPORTDOCS option support. If users install *-reference ports with NOPORTDOCS then these ports will be register with nothing stuff installed. ;-) It's one of reason we provide *-reference slave ports.

BTW/OT: I am against automatic dynamic pkg-plist:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsToDo#head-d39af25709360f5285b40c03255de7465fa717fa
.. I perfer static plist, I use it awful a lot in offline. I wouldn't have done share/gnome/ -> share/ quick without that static plist. Also it helps
a lot to notice if file(s) install in the wrong place. I use it a lot to
know which file/directory come from port.

Yeh, I'm all in favor of having all files listed in pkg-plist.

Good!

Cheers,
Mezz


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to