On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:26:17 +0200 Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Is the numbering the same, as we get with my patch in the PR? Could you > please try this on a couple of ruby ports? > I'll try this evening. > Dynamically generated plists are usually not well received, as you > cannot know a priori what files the port will install. Since this only > affects port documentation, though, I think this would be ok. > > But you would have to add all files under the doc-prefix into this plist > *after* the port has been installed. This could spell trouble. > Not so much problem in fact, as rdoc files always install into the well-known location. It'd be much simpler than to rebuild pkg-plist of all ports by hand to comply with new sort scheme. Personally, I don't like an idea of putting files with dynamically generated names into pkg-plist at all. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
