Kris Kennaway píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 23:51 +0100: > > A user pointed out to me that on the project ideas page the following > > entry remains: > > > > Write a new utility for the pkg_install suite, possibly named > > pkg_upgrade(1), implementing a subset of existing portupgrade > > functionality. The required functionality is: > > FWIW, I have no idea why this is on the project list. I suspect it was > added by someone without any consensus that it's a good idea.
That was me, a year ago.
> We have several upgrade tools in ports, and that is where they belong.
> Any effort should be spent on improving existing tools, unless you can
> make a really good case why they are fundamentally flawed and need to be
> rewritten from scratch, discarding all of the previous work on them.
Since then portmaster matured, so we might think about removing the item
from Ideas list.
I can't agree with you that the upgrading utilities have to stay in
ports. I'd very much like to see one of them be present in the base.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate,
saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee? 26 And the
Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it down some
where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask him again.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
