On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:42:33 +0100 Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Stefan Thurner wrote: > | On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > |> Hash: SHA512 > |> > |> Stefan Thurner wrote: > |> | Hi! > |> | > |> | xlockmore ist not a real run dependency. It's just an option as a > |> | possible locker program. > |> > |> nope, it's the default locker. Removing the dependency on it would mean > |> provide a list of option allowing to choose among the whole set of > |> available lockers. > |> And since a locker is just a program being executed upon timeout, > |> anything could be a locker. > |> > | Ok. But an option to just disable xlockmore would be nice. > > xlock comes with xlockmore on FreeBSD. It would mean disable a default. You could use OPTIONS to let the user set RUN_DEPENDS and patch the config file (or whatever, I'm not familiar with xautolock) to use what user chooses. If you don't want to do that then yes, you are right, don't remove the dependency as this will "break" xautolock. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
