On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:03:23PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 16:59:37 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain
>>> the security/barnyard port. There's a patch that is necessary for
>>> barnyard to work correctly on a 64bit system. I'm wondering if I can
>>> use OPTIONS to make this patch optional if the system is 64 bit, but I'm
>>> not sure what the syntax would be inside the if statement.
>>>
>>> .if defined(WITH_64BIT)
>>> do-patch: patchname
>>> .endif
>>
>>
>> I would do something like (please check the list of 64 bits platforms)
>>
>> .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "ia64" || ${ARCH} == "sparc64"
>> # apply the patch here
>> .endif
>>
>>>
>>> I assume the patch would have to be in the filesdir but could not be
>>> named "patch-foo" or it would always be applied, correct?
>>>
>>
>> Please check the reply from pav@ for this ;-)
>
> That brings up an interesting question. Which would be the preferred
> method? To use an OPTION knob? Or simply apply the patch if the arch
> matches? I'm thinking the latter. I've tested the former method, and it
> works fine. Does it matter which method I use?
I don't think it matters really, but is probably a matter of personal
preference. The only problem with using an option that I see is that if
the user has no idea if (s)he is on a 64bit platform and turns the
option off. It's for this reason I'd suggest using the .if ${ARCH}
approach.
-- WXS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
