Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 7:28:48 +0100, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to
make my patch more proper?
I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from
<http://www.stlport.org/> ).
If you want to test it, my patch is available at
<http://people.freebsd.org/~thierry/ports/stlport.diff>.
It does not seem bad on i386, but there is a problem on amd64: it builds
and installs fine, but the regression tests eat all the memory! (If no
solution is found, I shall mark it broken on != i386).
Regards,
It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with
stlport/config/stl_gcc.h.
What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc?
Adding this attached file to stlport/files made it work for my system.
--- stlport/stl/config/_gcc.h.orig 2007-11-20 18:33:19.000000000 -0600
+++ stlport/stl/config/_gcc.h 2007-11-20 18:34:45.000000000 -0600
@@ -352,9 +352,9 @@
/*
* Before version 3.4.0 the 0 patch level was not part of the include path:
*/
-# elif defined (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && ((__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) || \
+# elif (defined (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && ((__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) || \
(__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__
>= 4) || \
- (__GNUC__ > 3))
+ (__GNUC__ > 3))) && !defined(
__FreeBSD__ )
# define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH
../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__.__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__
# else
# define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
