On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >Also WITHOUT_X11 will only disable X support in ports for which it is > >optional. Many (probably most) ports that require X cannot work > >without it, and if such a port is either specified explicitly or > >pulled in as a dependency then you'll get what you asked for. > > Yes, but most of the time the X11 libs are pulled in on a headless > server because of some dependency you don't need (e.g. php->gd->X11 > for XPM which is not needed if you use PNG; or ghostscript->X11 on a > printserver where you don't intend to display the postscript before > printing). In this case WITHOUT_X11 works without a problem (at least > on those servers I use this).
It works perfectly well for its intended purpose. As long as one is not confused about what that purpose is ;-) Kris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"