Andrew Pantyukhin píše v st 21. 03. 2007 v 11:31 +0300: > On 3/21/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When you need a program which needs a newer lib than installed on a > > production system, but you don't get a maintenance window to update > > all other programs which use this lib, then not having the old lib > > will hurt. > > > > When the reason for the library version bump also requires to change > > some parts in the source of the programs which make use of the lib, > > you have to update all programs at once. If some programs have bugs in > > more recent versions which you can't accept in production and when you > > need to install a program which needs the new lib version, you are > > busted when you don't have the old lib around. > > But don't you smell an architectural flaw here (of the > ports system) and don't you feel that working around it > in a tool in the base system might only mess things up > even more?..
No I don't see a systematic flaw here. Or you suggest we reset all shmajors everywhere to zero? -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The hottest spot in the solar system is neither Mercury, Venus, nor St. Louis in the summer. -- WUSTL Press Release
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy