On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200 > Vasil Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Interesting: > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host > > mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; > > Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your > > IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to > > RCPT TO command) > > > > Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? > > Romania also. > > Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp[42226]: 05C3A1711B: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > relay=mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117]:25, delay=14, delays=0.2/0.15/2.6/11, > dsn=5.7.1, sta > tus=bounced (host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service > unavailable; Client host [81.196.204.98] blocked using ro.countries.nerd.dk; > Your IP is in ro, rejected b > ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command)) > > > Nils, you're a port maintainer, please fix this $&^*@ > > > Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr > (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail > like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to > ports belonging this type of maintainers.
In this kind of situation I think an instant maintainer timeout is acceptable. You have made a best effort to contact the maintainer and they have disallowed your email by policy, indicating that they are not interested in receiving it. I'd say it's also grounds for replacing the maintainer by someone else more liberal in their mail acceptance policy. Kris
pgpDnCWsVcvMP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
