On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:13:06AM +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 16:05:21 +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:01:46PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > The ports make infrastructure has a whole series of variables for showing > > > how one port depends on another: LIB_DEPENDS, BUILD_DEPENDS, RUN_DEPENDS > > > etc. Amongst these is what looks to me like the vestigial remnant of > > > an earlier phase of the ports: the plain, unmodified 'DEPENDS' variable. > > > > > There is also a PR against this: ports/99724. Unfortunately, it hasn't > > made it into an -exp run on pointyhat yet as other patches had higher > > priority. It is on the TODO-list however, you are completely right that > > it should be removed. > > One thing that can be done in the meantime is to remove DEPENDS from > those 3 ports that still use it. So things are nice and tidy when time > comes to edit bsd.port.mk. > Yes! It would be great if someone could do that. One of them was already patched yesterday, so only two remaining. A followup to the PR would be great as well once that's done, so portmgr won't wonder about the patches included there when they start testing it.
Cheers, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// And it makes you cry. <____) (____> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpouIoD5A4I1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
