Paul Schmehl wrote:
> What I want isn't really relevant. I'm simply suggesting that updating
> the port to include an OPTION for with_ssl seems unnecessary *unless*
> someone is going to port sipX. Have you looked at sipX? Porting it
> would not be simple, and I wonder how much demand there would be. In
> any case, *unless* sipX gets ported, it doesn't make sense to me to
> update www/libwww simply to enable an option no one has asked for until
> now.
OTOH, what harm does it cause?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
