Is there any reason why the nagios user/group isn't using a standardized UID/GID from /usr/ports/{U,G}IDs these days? It's been best practice for port maintainers some time to do this, and it's biting me in the arse at the moment as I roll out nagios2 (and nrpe2).
I don't wan't to pick a a number that will a) be used by a future registration or b) a large number that adduser will work around. And count me as another person who would like to see the nrpe2 port check for the nagios user/group and add them to the system if needed. Seeing a process run as user -1 is just wrong... :( Best Wishes - Peter -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature