On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:56:49AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 01:44 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:32:18AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:01 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > >On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:45:56PM -0300, Rainer Alves wrote:
> > > >>Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > > >>>In preparation for the 6.2 release, the ports tree will be frozen from
> > > >>>October 10.
> > > >>>[...]
> > > >>
> > > >>Just wondering if there's a chance of seeing Gnome 2.16 committed before
> > > >>the freeze (I'm asking this since apparently it's already in the
> > > >>marcuscom repo). Not that I care much about Gnome (I'm using xfce after
> > > >>all), but I'm interested in the new GTK and Evolution versions.
> > > >
> > > >I'd be interested to know about the GNOME team's plans for this,
> > > >myself.
> > > 
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/newsflash.html#event2006September17:0
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> I based this off of the SDL conversation.  The GNOME 2.16 merge will be
> _much_ more involved since the PREFIX move will touch a lot of ports.
> We were thinking of a full pointyhat regression.  I'm all for a
> pre-freeze commit if you think it's doable, but know that I will be
> traveling in the UK for two weeks starting on the 23rd, so at least I
> will be spotty when it comes to helping out with breakage.

The SDL commit will likely be able to proceed, actually - the schedule
announced by re@ gives us more time before the freeze than I'd first
thought, and I'm testing the SDL patch set now.

GNOME is obviously a much bigger enterprise though.  The fact that
you're travelling would be a concern for merging before the release,
but perhaps you feel comfortable that others would be able to take
care of problems in your absence?  We may be able to test the patchset
on pointyhat later in the week, depending on how the next exp build
goes.  That's probably about the time you're leaving though.

Kris

Attachment: pgpuyLgXIjndh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to