Nadow wrote: > Excuse my ignorance but, Cant be beta or RC versions of programs in the > ports tree?. You know, like enlighteenment-0.17 which has been (and It is > still) a beta for 5 years and it is in the ports tree as > enlightenment-0.16.999.0.2 > > Thank you for your time
Problem here is that right now there are 47 ports I've changed or added for xfce 4.4 (rc, beta). And I find it kinda bloated to duplicate each of those ports to create a "-devel" version. Think about it, this would include every xfce component and plugin and so on... I like it more the way gnome folks are doing it by only checking in final releases, and providing the "in between" states online as I do... http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/ Right now, as mentioned, I'm working on a rc1 patchset/shar archive and I'll post the link here as I did it since xfce 4.0 was beta.... -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
