Interesting - another MakeMaker weirdness I guess?

John: here's a bug report I'm passing along for version.pm, not sure what the deal is. On my machine I've confirmed that 'perl Makefile.PL; make;' doesn't produce any man pages in blib/ with version.pm 0.652.

 -Ken

On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:51 PM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:

Hi,
    I noticed that now p5-version does not install manpages.
    I'd try to make a patch for that. Can you investigate that?

Thanks,

--- Makefile.PL.orig    Wed Jul 19 23:22:09 2006
+++ Makefile.PL Thu Jul 20 10:29:00 2006
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
AUTHOR => 'John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>') :
                      ()
                    ),
+                  MAN3PODS        =>
+                      {'lib/version.pod' => 'blib/man3/version.3' },
                   PM              =>
                       {'lib/version.pm' => '$(INST_LIBDIR)/version.pm'},
                   PL_FILES        => {},

On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:20:06PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
Thanks.  I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem.  I
think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build.

 -Ken

On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:

Hi,
   Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
   'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on
   p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem.

   i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but
        p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too.

   Currently I've made patches (copy version-related codes from
   0.2801) to solve this problem temporary, can you help me to
   permanent avoid this problem?

Regards,
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@

--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to