Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > I wonder what is the reason SDL has it's version appended everywhere > (include/SDL11 instead of include/SDL, libSDL-1.1.so instead of > libSDL.so, sdl11-config instead of sdl-config). It takes extra time when > porting SDL software, extra patches need to be added. Is there any good > reason for such changes to sdl' file names?
Once we had SDL 1.0 in the tree too and this was done to avoid conflicts between both versions. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
