Doug Barton wrote:
> What would you think about something like this?
> http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-listplus.diff
That shows the info I'm interested in :) Perhaps it can be improved
slightly by having the 'new version' output on the same line ? So
instead of :
===>>> en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.2
===>>> New version available: openoffice.org-2.0.3rc6
===>>> fetchmail-6.3.2_1
===>>> New version available: fetchmail-6.3.4_3
Something like :
===>>> en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.2 update available: openoffice.org-2.0.3rc6
===>>> fetchmail-6.3.2_1 update available: fetchmail-6.3.4_3
And perhaps add < > like 'pkg_version -v' :
en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.2 < needs updating (port has 2.0.3rc6)
fetchmail-6.3.2_1 < needs updating (port has 6.3.4_3)
Also in list mode, the '===>>> ' seems unnecessary to me.
>> | \--- 86809 root [dialog]
>> # kill 21889 86809
>> ## what was going on here ? Daemonized distfile fetching perhaps ?
>
> Yes. The configure.kde3 script uses dialog, even in the make checksum
> target. That is, um, weird; although I do see why they do it that way.
> I'm really not sure how to handle this, so if anyone has a suggestion
> ...
Uhmpf, not yet (apart from uglyness ;-)
What is the reasoning by the kde team ?
>> # Adobe Reader
>> Please type "accept" to accept the terms and conditions of license
>> agreement; Type "decline" to exit.
>> # accept
>> ## Is there some way to handle this upfront like config ? This halted my
>> ## build run for hours :-(
>
> No, sorry. Things that happen during the port make/install process
> that are interactive can't be front loaded. However, I will add a
> check to the dependency tracking and build to warn if IS_INTERACTIVE
> is set anywhere.
That would help, but only if it is possible to split a big upgrade set
into parts, so that the interactive ones can be isolated.
>> Can I skip en-openoffice.org-US-2.0.2 somehow for 'portmaster -GavD' ?
>
> Adding a list of ports to ignore is on the TODO list. Several people
> have requested this, but so far no one has sent me an example of how
> portupgrade flags this.
Here's a port of my pkgtools.conf about HOLD_PKGS :
# HOLD_PKGS: array
#
# This is a list of ports you don't want portupgrade(1) to upgrade,
# portversion(1) to suggest upgrading, or pkgdb(1) to fix.
# You can use wildcards ("ports glob" and "pkgname glob").
# -f/--force with each command will override the held status.
#
# To completely hide the existence of a package, put a dummy file
# named "+IGNOREME" in the package directory.
#
# cf. pkg_glob(1), ports_glob(1)
#
# e.g.:
# HOLD_PKGS = [
# 'bsdpan-*',
# 'x11*/XFree86*',
# ]
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'openoffice-*',
# 'perl-*',
]
Is this what you needed ?
regards,
Hans Lambermont
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
