freebsd-pkgbase  

Messages by Thread

• • pkg install -r FreeBSD-base -g 'FreeBSD-*' (was: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase) Graham Perrin
  • releng/15.0, pkg 2.3.1_1, FreeBSD-base disabled (was: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase) Graham Perrin
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase Mark Millard
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase [just: fixed a mangled Email address] Mark Millard
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase Manfred Koch
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase Manfred Koch
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase Manfred Koch
  • Re: FreeBSD15.0 stable pkgbase Manfred Koch
• "pkg update -rFreeBSD-base" with FreeBSD-base disabled does not actually update; it does with FreeBSD-base enabled Mark Millard
  • Re: "pkg update -rFreeBSD-base" with FreeBSD-base disabled does not actually update; it does with FreeBSD-base enabled Jan Bramkamp
  • Re: "pkg update -rFreeBSD-base" with FreeBSD-base disabled does not actually update; it does with FreeBSD-base enabled Graham Perrin
• pkg rquery -rFreeBSD-base for pkgbase packages does not return upstream %v information when FreeBSD-base is disabled: local %v instead Mark Millard
• FYI: poudriere jail size for METHOD freebsdci for VERSION stable-14 vs. for METHOD pkgbase for 15.0-STABLE Mark Millard
• "# pkg upgrade -r FreeBSD-base" does not work with FreeBSD-base disabled: "FreeBSD-base is up to date" vs. "Fetching data.pkg: . . ." for enabled Mark Millard
• FYI: pkg clean with FreeBSD-base disabled cleans out even installed FreeBSD-* base pacakges from the cache Mark Millard
  • FYI: pkg clean with FreeBSD-base disabled cleans out even installed FreeBSD-* base packages from the cache Graham Perrin
  • Re: FYI: pkg clean with FreeBSD-base disabled cleans out even installed FreeBSD-* base pacakges from the cache Baptiste Daroussin
  • Re: FYI: pkg clean with FreeBSD-base disabled cleans out even installed FreeBSD-* base pacakges from the cache Mark Millard
  • Re: FYI: pkg clean with FreeBSD-base disabled cleans out even installed FreeBSD-* base pacakges from the cache Dag-Erling Smørgrav
• FreeBSD-clang provides both libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.so and the (should be?) lib32 item: libclang_rt.asan-i386.so:32 ? More . . . Mark Millard
  • Re: FreeBSD-clang provides both libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.so and the (should be?) lib32 item: libclang_rt.asan-i386.so:32 ? More . . . Mark Millard
• Re: PKGBASE upgrade from ALPHAxx to BETAxx [FreeBSD-base with enable: no planned] Mark Millard
  • Re: PKGBASE upgrade from ALPHAxx to BETAxx [FreeBSD-base with enable: no planned] Mark Millard
• lib32 not installed - but required when update [Also: BETA1 had wrong FreeBSD-base.conf content?] Mark Millard
• lib32 not installed - but required when update vermaden
  • Re: lib32 not installed - but required when update vermaden
  • Re: lib32 not installed - but required when update Lexi Winter
• Re: FreeBSD-set-minimal, pkg, FreeBSD-pkg-bootstrap Lexi Winter
• Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Matteo Riondato
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Matteo Riondato
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Matteo Riondato
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Roger Marquis
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Matteo Riondato
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Roger Marquis
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Doug Rabson
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Chris
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Chris
  • Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Lexi Winter
• pkg(8) Repos vermaden
  • Re: pkg(8) Repos Dave Cottlehuber
  • RE: pkg(8) Repos Mark Millard
  • Re: pkg(8) Repos Mark Millard
• Re: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Lukas Engelhardt
  • AW: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 [email protected]
  • Re: AW: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Manfred Koch
  • Re: AW: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Graham Perrin
  • Re: AW: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Manfred Koch
  • Re: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Graham Perrin
  • Re: pkgbase + migrate to FreeBSD15/amd64 Alexander Ziaee
• FreeBSD-set-src package is marked as vital? polyduekes
• manual action required updating from 15.0-ALPHA to 15-STABLE with pkgbase Lexi Winter
  • Re: manual action required updating from 15.0-ALPHA to 15-STABLE with pkgbase Erichans
• Re: About the upcoming changes to pkgbase Graham Perrin
• For poudriere(-devel) use with -mpkgbase=??? use, what FBSDVERSNO values will be supported for: -v FBSDVERSNO ? Mark Millard
• FYI: The current status of what pkgbase podriere jail creations/updates end up installing that might not be intended Mark Millard
  • Re: FYI: The current status of what pkgbase podriere jail creations/updates end up installing that might not be intended Mark Millard
  • Re: FYI: The current status of what pkgbase podriere jail creations/updates end up installing that might not be intended Lexi Winter
• Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update is even odder] Mark Millard
• New PKGBASE Alias Proposal vermaden
  • Re: New PKGBASE Alias Proposal Lexi Winter
  • Re: New PKGBASE Alias Proposal vermaden
• pkg rquery -r FreeBSD-base failure on aarch64 system: "pkg: repository FreeBSD-base contains packages for wrong OS version: FreeBSD:16:aarch64" Mark Millard
  • Re: pkg rquery -r FreeBSD-base failure on aarch64 system: "pkg: repository FreeBSD-base contains packages for wrong OS version: FreeBSD:16:aarch64" Mark Millard
• FYI: What pkgbase material is out of date relative to FreeBSD-SA-25:08.openssl and FreeBSD-EN-25:18.freebsd-update Mark Millard
• Fwd: poudriere-devel, IMMUTABLE_BASE=yes, UFS context, pkgbase METHOD context, reports: chflags: /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/main-aarch64-default/ref/boot/modules: No such file or directory Mark Millard
• Re: user feedback Lexi Winter
  • Re: user feedback Olivier Certner
  • Re: user feedback Lexi Winter
  • Re: user feedback void
  • pkgbase in the FreeBSD Handbook (was: user feedback) Graham Perrin
  • FreeBSD-EN-25:18.freebsd-update (was: user feedback) Graham Perrin
  • pkg delete -af (was: user feedback) Graham Perrin
  • Re: pkg delete -af Dag-Erling Smørgrav
  • (289368) freebsd-update and pkgbase on the same system (was: user feedback) Graham Perrin
  • Re: user feedback Mark Millard
  • Re: user feedback infoomatic
  • Re: user feedback Lexi Winter
• Two notes on poudriere(-devel) vs. modern pkg use by FreeBSD Mark Millard
  • Re: Two notes on poudriere(-devel) vs. modern pkg use by FreeBSD [corrections in note 1 mostly] Mark Millard
  • Re: Two notes on poudriere(-devel) vs. modern pkg use by FreeBSD Lexi Winter
  • Re: Two notes on poudriere(-devel) vs. modern pkg use by FreeBSD Mark Millard
• A repository enabled vs. disabled vs. missing oddity Mark Millard
• PKGBASE in ZFS Boot Environments World vermaden
  • Re: PKGBASE in ZFS Boot Environments World vermaden
• https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290322 is about pkg not building without FreeBSD-jail-dev installed: Makefile has ".if !exists(/usr/include/jail.h)" Mark Millard
• pkg: sqlite error while executing BEGIN IMMEDIATE TRANSACTION in file pkgdb.c:1206: cannot start a transaction within a transaction · Issue #2522 · freebsd/pkg (was: user feedback) Graham Perrin
• [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 290010] stable/15 make packages TARGET failure due to etcupdate.8.gz missing bugzilla-noreply
• packaged kernel not booting following an upgrade Graham Perrin
• Re: --case-sensitive (was: Questions about pkgbase) Mark Millard
• https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ last updated 2025-Sep-26 20:27 or so; base_weekly/ 2025-Sep-21 10:59 or so Mark Millard
• [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289969] `make -j 8 buildworld buildkernel update-packages` doesn't work as is expected bugzilla-noreply
• FYI, as stands, "pkg del FreeBSD-diff3" wants to delete: FreeBSD-diff3-dbg FreeBSD-set-optional*-dbg FreeBSD*-tests FreeBSD-tests-dbg but not FreeBSD-diff3 Mark Millard
• pkg info -d -C -x '^FreeBSD-set-*' reports lines with "-(null)" a lot in my context (instead of the -16.snap* being shown) Mark Millard
  • Re: pkg info -d -C -x '^FreeBSD-set-*' reports lines with "-(null)" a lot in my context (instead of the -16.snap* being shown) Lexi Winter
• Why are /usr/lib/pam*.so in FreeBSD-runtime instead of FreeBSD-runtime-dev ? Mark Millard
  • Re: Why are /usr/lib/pam*.so in FreeBSD-runtime instead of FreeBSD-runtime-dev ? Mark Millard
• https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? Mark Millard
  • Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update is even odder] Mark Millard
  • Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update is even odder] Graham Perrin
• Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? Mark Millard
  • Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? Colin Percival
  • Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? Mark Millard
  • Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? Philip Paeps
• 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Mark Millard
  • Re: 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Graham Perrin
  • Re: 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Lexi Winter
  • Re: 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Mark Millard
  • Re: 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Mark Millard
• Correct /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem results from pkgbase installations? Mark Millard
• Re: Is the base set of packages everything, or not? Lexi Winter
  • standard set (was: Is the base set of packages everything, or not?) Graham Perrin
  • Re: Is the base set of packages everything, or not? Graham Perrin
• [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
  • [Bug 289654] 15.0-ALPHA2 packages: no /proc directory bugzilla-noreply
• An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Mark Millard
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Lexi Winter
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Mark Millard
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Lexi Winter
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Mark Millard
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? [ release/packages/sets/*.ucl vs. FreeBSD-set-* update timing ] Mark Millard
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Emmanuel Vadot
  • Re: An odd vital FreeBSD-set-* result? Mark Millard
• Re: bsdconfig lost through a major upgrade Lexi Winter
• An idea for some future point : provide for FreeBSD-kernel-generic-debug installs to help debug 15.?-RELEASE problems without software builds Mark Millard
• FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files Mark Millard
  • FreeBSD-ports 1500063 with FreeBSD-base 1600000 (was: FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files) Graham Perrin
  • Deliberate mistakes (was: FreeBSD-ports 1500063 with FreeBSD-base 1600000) Graham Perrin
  • Re: FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files Mark Millard
  • Re: FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files Mark Millard
  • poudriere build f1f933bf3548 on beefy17 (was: FYI: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ has been updated with 15.0-ALPHA2 *.pkg files) Graham Perrin
• Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default? vermaden
  • Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default? vermaden
  • Re: Why pkg(8) is NOT bootstrapped in PKGBASE install by default? vermaden
• I've got a pkg 2.3.1 "pkg-static autoremove" that has grown to have over 1 GiByte of RAM resident after more than 77 minutes of cpu time Mark Millard
  • Re: I've got a pkg 2.3.1 "pkg-static autoremove" that has grown to have over 1 GiByte of RAM resident after more than 77 minutes of cpu time [backtrace added] Mark Millard
• RE: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Lexi Winter
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Lexi Winter
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Lexi Winter
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Lexi Winter
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Mark Millard
  • Re: git: 66f36c368676 - main - packages: Add meta-package sets [ a pkgbase poudriere jail creation got a populated /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main-amd64/usr/src/ ], not just sys/ Lexi Winter
• pkgbase update procedure, using, for example, clibs as an example to illustrate the more general question Mark Millard
  • Re: pkgbase update procedure, using, for example, clibs as an example to illustrate the more general question Graham Perrin
  • Re: pkgbase update procedure, using, for example, clibs as an example to illustrate the more general question Mark Millard
• man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation polyduekes
  • Re: man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation Lexi Winter
  • Re: man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation Lexi Winter
  • Re: man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation Graham Perrin
  • Re: man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation polyduekes
  • Re: man -k and man -f not working with pkgbase 15-stable installation Graham Perrin
• poudriere-devel unable to update main [so: 16] jail world absent materials for FreeBSD-ports and FreeBSD-ports-kmods Mark Millard
• pkg 2.3.0 has been committed; should lead to less time consming poudriere bulk port-package build runs Mark Millard
• https://pkg.freebsd.org link for FreeBSD:16:aarch64 is still getting: "404 Not Found" after the others updated Mark Millard
• Re: 15* jails to build base packages Mark Millard

• Earlier messages
• Later messages