https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209475
--- Comment #18 from fehmi noyan isi <fnoyan...@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #17) Sounds a better approach than I suggested, thanks! As the allocation size can be set by the user, don't you think mallocarray(9) would be a better choice than malloc(9) in this case? I see that you mentioned using mallocarray(9) could be a separate commit, but once the code is updated to fix a memory allocation issue, it may pay to use the new system call we have. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
