On Friday 08 January 2010 06:04:34 Peter wrote: > iH, > Playing around with FIBs and jails. > > The host system is on a private 172.xxx network with a gateway of 172.xxx > going through a NAT box for internet. [fib 0] > > The jail has only a public IP, on fib 1 [with gateway being ISP router] > > With this, the jail is working fine. > > What I'm trying to accomplish is portknocking for 'ssh' access: > > pass in log quick proto tcp from any to any port {1234} synproxy state \ > (max-src-conn-rate 5/15, overload <portknock_ssh>) > > Because the jail is on 'fib 1', the connection is never established to > overload the rule. The 'synproxy state' is communicating via the > 172.xxxx/default gateway [of fib 0] instead of via the public "fib 1" > > I can ssh into the jail if I do > pass in log quick proto tcp from any to any port {22} keep state > > I CANNOT ssh into the jail if I do > pass in log quick proto tcp from any to any port {22} synproxy state > > Anyway I can force 'synproxy' to communicate via fib 1 ?
I don't think I understand your setup and intent completely, but you can select a fib with the "rtable" filter parameter. It *should* be used for the synproxy communication, as well. Please report if this helps. -- Max _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"