Hello, Why do you think it's unrealiable technology ? I think system that you propose rely on this technology ;) Most of this use bsd/linux/unix on board with own solutions and than they're packed into the box with cute web interface. Of course I can be wrong...
Best regards, Shamrock 2008/11/29 David Roseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- On Mon, 11/24/08, Marcello Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Marcello Barreto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer > > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 4:04 PM > > Hello Folks, > > I believe you have heard this several times, but I'm > > new to FreeBSD and i'm trying to change my bandwidth > > control from Linux (iptables + TC + iproute) to Freebsd (PF > > + ALTQ). > > I read about PF and I was very interested on it, but I > > want to limit the bandwidth (Download and Upload) from each > > customer behind a router (Obviously, FreeBSD with PF.).. > > There are several networks and a lot of customers, and with > > my rules, only what I got was each customer sharing the same > > queue... > > > > There are my rules: > > altq on $external cbq queue {def_up, def_up300, def_up450, > > def_up600, def_up1000} > > altq on $internal cbq queue {def_down, def_down300, > > def_down450, def_down600, def_down1000} > > > > queue def_up bandwidth 10% cbq(default) > > queue def_down bandwidth 10% cbq(default) > > > > queue def_up300 bandwidth 128Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_up450 bandwidth 200Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_up600 bandwidth 300Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_up1000 bandwidth 500Kb cbq(red) > > > > queue def_down300 bandwidth 300Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_down450 bandwidth 450Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_down600 bandwidth 600Kb cbq(red) > > queue def_down1000 bandwidth 1024Kb cbq(red) > > > > > > pass in quick inet proto {tcp, udp} from <mylocalnet> > > to any queue def_down300 > > pass out quick inet proto {tcp, udp} from > > <mylocalnet> to any queue def_up300 > > > > You should consider a commercial product rather than relying on > old and somewhat unreliable technology. We've been able to squeeze a > lot more customers onto our network for a $3500. investment. It paid for > itself in 2 months. We have a dual-core 2.33Ghz system passing 95Mb/s > with 12000 rules in place and it runs at about 10%. The latest version is > truly amazing. > > http://www.etinc.com > > > Regards, > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"