Angelo Turetta wrote:
Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote:
I had the same issue and when I checked with our ms-admin team they said
it was a Microsoft limitation.
Quite the opposite. Since Windows2000 MS introduced, or started using,
a CallID in the GRE header.
Indeed.
Remember, many-to-one NAT has only become widely used/mandatory in
recent years,
I wouldn't say that recent, trying to get address space out of RIPE for
the past decade is like pulling teeth.
I remember getting a full ClassC subnet from my first provider
(128Kbps, ca. 1995-1996) without even asking.
Those were the days, I can remember having a conversation with Pipex
here in the UK circa 1994 where their account manager asked if a /24
would be enough for the 64k line I was connecting. His assured me that
they recommended at least 2 and that 4 * /24s wouldn't be a problem.
Considering I was plumbing connectivity using SCO and the TIS FWTK at
the time, a /29 was overkill.
Regards
Greg
Angelo Turetta
Modena - Italy
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
