On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24/01/2012 17:53, Marcin Markowski wrote:
>> On 24.01.2012 14:22, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin
>>>> Markowski<mmarkow...@leon.pl>wrote:
>>>
>>>>> (on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 100% CPU),
>>>
>>>>> hw.ixgbe.num_queues=16
>>>
>>> If there really are 16 hardware queues, shouldn't there be 16 kernel
>>> threads for queue processing?
>>
>> There are 16 threads, but only one of them consumes 100% CPU and the others
>> do not use more than 5% CPU:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/BWDWh8kW
>
> You need Jack to confirm it but this looks like a serious problem /
> bottleneck. It just shouldn't be like that (if the test is exactly the same).
>
Is this by any chance non-IP traffic (or encapsulated in some way).
I remember similar thread :
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/igb-ixgbe-RSS-RX-queues-for-non-IP-traffic-td4778961.html
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
