On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs
> much better than SCHED_4BSD?
I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop
environment for years. I had numerous people try to help, including
Jeff, with various tunables, dtrace'ing, etc. The cause of the problem
was never found.
I switched to 4BSD, problem gone.
This is on 2 separate systems with core 2 duos.
hth,
Doug
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
