2011/3/12 Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk>: > In message <4d7b44af.7040...@freebsd.org>, Martin Matuska writes: > > > Thanks a lot for doing this properly. > >>What significance level should I take? > > I think I set ministat(1) to use 95 % confidence level by default > and that is in general a pretty safe bet (1 in 20 chance) > >>I hope this approach is better :) > > Much, much better. > > As I said, this was not to go after you personally, but to point > out that we need to be more rigorous with benchmarks in general. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
i'm still curious about things like CPUTYPE= and -march= configured as native, gentlemen. is it the "golden egg" to use with our system or not? why "natives" aren't in the benchs? /me feels confused. -- Vinícius Zavam profiles.google.com/egypcio _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
