> Personally I was surprised by this statement that libpthread wasn't > working for his test, for me it does benchmark a tad slower but I have > always seen libpthread as the most stable threading library.
I am surprised too. But It really happened in my test. You can get the crash situation from my last letter. Best regards, Leo Huang 2006/1/4, Michael Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Chris wrote: > > >On 01/01/06, Michael Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>huang leo wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hi, all: > >>> > >>>We had evaluated MySQL performance on FreeBSD and Linux. The result is > >>>attached. > >>> > >>>We are longing for your feedbacks! > >>> > >>> > >>>Best regards, > >>> > >>>Leo Huang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Really good work. > >> > >>I gave your results some thought and was thinking that maybe you should > >>check to see if you reached the default 1500 threading limit of libthr > >>and maybe it needs to be increased, I set mine to 40000 like below. > >>kern.threads.max_threads_per_proc=40000 > >>kern.threads.max_groups_per_proc=40000 > >> > >>I was thinking it would be good to show threading usage activity with > >>some kind of 1 second loop doing ps -auxwH | grep -c 'mysql' or > >>something like that so we could see what limits its getting to, and so I > >>can have an idea of what I can compare it to on my own servers. > >> > >>Just a suggestion. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Mike > >> > >> > > > > > >Well sorry if I am completely wrong here, but that test seems to indicate > >there is a general stability problem with libpthread. My own experience > >backs up their results since on a production web server with heavy forums I > >have had mysql lockups until I tinkered with the threading settings. > > > Personally I was surprised by this statement that libpthread wasn't > working for his test, for me it does benchmark a tad slower but I have > always seen libpthread as the most stable threading library. > > libthr doesn't work very well at all under amd64 in Java benchmarks > (Java will core in a few minutes of usage) while pthread is much more > reliable. > > >I am confused now as their is very little documentation on this, google > >throws up barely anything and my main concern is stability. > > > >Chris > > > > > I believe the best thing to do is always just benchmark and use whats > best for you, there is no guarantee with this stuff. > > BTW I did a few super smack tests and saw that the thread numbers > doesn't appear to reach thread numbers above 1500 but I only tested with > smaller client numbers. > > Mike > > > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
