On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:25 PM void <v...@f-m.fm> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:42:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: > >Change the subject to `Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14`, was `Re: > >Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge`. > > > >I actually prepared two patches, one depends on the other: > > > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218 << apply this patch firstly > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213 << apply this patch secondly > > > >Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Hi, > > What version (git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD) did you > patch? > It was based on the latest stable/14 branch @commit 025535f94525. Or your command returns this: # git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD 269221
> I installed > FreeBSD-14.1-STABLE-amd64-20241017-d36ba3989ca9-269125-disc1.iso and > then updated the sources with git before checking out stable/14 which is > n269252, applying the patches and building/installing kernel from there. > > What's the exact iperf command you're using please? I'm using > > # iperf --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232 > > This is ok. I used iperf3. but I'm not sure [see note a] if that one would give comparable tests to > yours. > > Please re-organize your test result in before/after patch order. So that I can understand and compare them. -- Best Regards, Cheng Cui
