Hi everyone, Did anyone had the chance to take a look? For me it’s a bug but before filling the PR want to know what’s your view or if it’s a limitation or bug by design. Br Santi
> On 12 Jul 2024, at 19:06, Santiago Martinez <s...@codenetworks.net> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone. > > While adding -F ( fib as used in netstat ) to ping and ping6 I have found > something that from my understanding is not correct. > Please can you advise? > I have the following setup : > > -- two fibs (0 and 1) > -- two loop-backs (lo0 and lo1). > -- Lo1 has been assigned to fib1 > -- net.add_addr_allfibs = 0 > My interface output looks like this: > > ifconfig lo0 | grep inet6 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > ifconfig lo1 | grep inet6 > inet6 fe80::1%lo1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > > > If I do a netstat -rn -6 -F0 I get the following which is was i expected. > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > ::/96 link#2 URS > lo0 > ::1 link#2 UHS > lo0 > ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 link#2 URS > lo0 > fe80::%lo0/10 link#2 URS > lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 link#2 U > lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHS > lo0 > ff02::/16 link#2 URS > lo0 > > > Now, netstat -rn -6 -F1 shows "fe80::1%lo0" which should not be there and > "fe80::1%lo1" is missing which should be there. > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > fe80::%lo1/64 link#3 U > lo1 > fe80::1%lo0 link#2 UHS > lo0 > > > What output I was expecting was: > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > fe80::%lo1/64 link#3 U > lo1 > fe80::1%lo1 link#3 UHS > lo1 > > > > This makes the ping -6 -F0 fe80::1%lo0 to work but ping -6 -F1 fe80::1%l01 > to fail which I wanted to use as test case. > > Thanks in advance. > > Santiago >
