25.09.2021 03:31, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
> I know three main reasons that may prevent firewall+IPSec from working as 
> expected:
> 
> 1) for incoming packets: kernel could drop incoming packet withing ipsec code
> incrementing one of counters shown with "netstat -sp ipsec" command,
> so you should check it out first;
> 
> 2) for both outgoing and incoming packets there could be processing order 
> problem:
> packets processed first by pfil(9) framework (so pf/ipfw have a chance to do 
> NAT etc.)
> and only then sent to ipsec(4) to transform (in FreeBSD 11 at least), not 
> vice versa.

AFAIK, pf does not send packets to IPsec processing after NAT. You need
to make translation after IPsec processing using the if_enc interface.

> 
> 3) also read if_enc(4) manual page to make familiar with net.enc.out.* and 
> net.enc.in.* sysctl family,
> as it may affect, too. If you do not use enc(4) pseudo-interface, make sure 
> you changed defaults to:
> 
> net.enc.in.ipsec_filter_mask=0
> net.enc.out.ipsec_filter_mask=0
Another important variable that needs an attention is
net.inet.ipsec.filtertunnel

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to