https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256681
--- Comment #3 from Rodney W. Grimes <rgri...@freebsd.org> --- I strongly disagree that this is the "expected" route for a /32 placed on an "interface" Expected route table: 192.0.2.2 link#4 UHS 7 16384 lo0 The bug to find is why can we no longer access 192.0.2.2 via the routing table and the tap0 interface address, this is a local interface address and should be reachable no matter WHAT the routing table looks like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
