On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:37 PM Phil Rosenthal <winte...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 2021, at 8:22 PM, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:11 PM Phil Rosenthal <winte...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Apr 13, 2021, at 8:07 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <oliv...@freebsd.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Are you exiting through a tunnel interface (GRE, GIF, PPPoE, IPsec, > >>> OpenVPN, etc.) ? > >> No. > >> > >> I am running PF/Altq for NAT and Traffic shaping. > > > > ALTQ is the problem in this situation. Try without it and see if you > > get proper distribution. > > Yep, proper distribution with altq disabled. > > That's pretty unfortunate, though ... It means that I'm forced to deal with > the Comcast's buffer management which allows for more buffer bloat and is > less deterministic about what packets get dropped. > > I'm assuming that this won't get fixed due to PF generally not being > maintained these days -- is there any other solution for shaping with active > queue management (preferably RED) on FreeBSD to use instead of altq? Dummynet > obviously has problems of it's own.
pf in FreeBSD is pretty well maintained. altq currently has no maintainer (at least that I am aware of). It's a difficult problem, altq needs to "learn" a lot about multithreading. I'm not aware of anyone working on it, although Patrick Kelsey (pkelsey@) may be worth a ping (IIRC he might have looked at this problem a bit, I'd bet he could do it if he has time and some entity can sponsor the work). > In any event - thanks for your help. > -Phil _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
