https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248474
jeremy.mordk...@riftio.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeremy.mordk...@riftio.com
--- Comment #35 from jeremy.mordk...@riftio.com ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #17)
I have a VTI routed tunnel already to another PF Sense. LAN to LAN, no NAT,
wide open firewall rules. Bi directional traffic. Works fine.
I was trying to create a second VTI tunnel to a different server, but this one
needed SNAT. It is outbound only. The new tunnel was dropping all replies. I
could see them arrive on the ipsec* interface but they never exited the router
on the LAN interface.
These sysctl changes allowed the new tunnel to work, but they half-break the
existing LAN to LAN tunnel. Hosts on the "CORE" side where I made these sysctl
changes can still reach systems in the remote LAN, but the remote LAN cannot
access the core LAN. Again, they arrive on ipsec* but they never exit the LAN
port.
(a) Is there a way to have he best of both worlds? I suspect not.
(b) Is there a way to configure the old LAN to LAN tunnel such that inbound
traffic will flow again?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
