Hello Cristian, Thank you for your pointer, however if I quote part of my question: > From my understanding in FreeBSD the route command is unable to perform this > kind of configuration where you tell that the IPv4 /32 is available without > next-hop (no via) on a specific link.
I imply there that I read the man, tried quite a few things with the "route" command and could not get anything out of it. Best regards, Diego Abelenda On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:48:58 -0300 Cristian Cardoso <cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > The equivalent command in FreeBSD for the ip route is the route, > follow manpage https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?route > > Em qua., 9 de set. de 2020 às 11:43, Abelenda Diego > <diego.abele...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > Hello, > > > > I've got a FreeBSD installation in a DataCenter that provided me with a > > single address IPv4 with an upstream gateway (cidr is fine the upstream > > gateway works everything is nice and running). I use this machine for > > Masquerading an private infrastructure. > > > > Now I need other machines with public IPv4 and when I requested the > > additional IPv4 to the DataCenter, they gave me a bunch of /32 addresses > > saying that my previous IPv4 MUST be configured as next-hop on their side. > > From my understanding in FreeBSD the route command is unable to perform this > > kind of configuration where you tell that the IPv4 /32 is available without > > next-hop (no via) on a specific link. I know the linux "ip route add $IP dev > > $LINK" configures this, but I cannot seem to map this knowledge to FreeBSD. > > > > Is it possible to perform this very special setup with any command on > > FreeBSD? If yes what is that command? > > > > Best regards, > > Diego Abelenda
pgp1IPXqHWPpk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
