On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:36:34PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 09.07.2020 22:41, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > >> I am wondering if anyone has any objections to or concerns about this > >> proposal. Any feedback is appreciated. > > I'm for it. > > > maybe it is acceptable to document user visible changes. This could include > > * parameter tunings in /etc/sysctl.conf are only applied if the SCTP module > > is loaded from /etc/loader.conf. > > You mean /boot/loader.conf. > > This may be relaxed with "sctp_enable" knob for /etc/rc.conf and new startup > script > /etc/rc.d/sctp that: a) REQUIRE: kld; b) checks if sctp.ko already loaded and > load it as needed; > c) applies sctp sysctl tuning from /etc/sysctl.conf for values that differ.
Michael and I talked about this a bit in the past. I propose a more general solution, since it is a problem not just for SCTP: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25601 _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
