https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #25 from Lev A. Serebryakov <l...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #23) Now I have: igb + AESNI + bpf — one crash on older revision, no crashes for several hours of testing on newer revisions. It is very first stack trace, and I can not reproduce it anymore (with or without bpf). Looks like, we could skip this, as it is not reproducible. em + !AESNI — crash with or without bpf. All other stack traces (with IBVARIANTS and without them) are for this configuration. Looks like, bpf is not evolved at all. Unfortunately, I can not swap NICs or CPUs, as it is embedded-like hardware with everything soldered on board. I'll try igb + !AESNI tonight by unloading aesni.ko in first place. I'll send you URL for kernels + dumps via e-mail, as I'm not sure it doesn't contain sensitive data (it should not, but though). 11-STABLE which serves as "other end" of this test setup is r338960. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
