> 18.03.2018, 03:31, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>: > >> ?17.03.2018, 21:23, "Rodney W. Grimes" > >> <freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>: > >> ?>> ?16.03.2018, 14:50, "sth...@nethelp.no" <sth...@nethelp.no>: > >> ?>> ?.. > >> ?>> ?>> ?And thank you for that suggestion! The packet loss during ARP > >> refresh > >> ?>> ?>> ?(of the destination address connected to the output interface) > >> does > >> ?>> ?>> ?*not* happen when the box is forwarding! It only happens with > >> locally > >> ?>> ?>> ?generated traffic. > >> ?>> ?Should be fixed by r331098. > >> ?> > >> ?> Thanks for the quick fix, do we know about when this breakage started? > >> ?I guess it's something like r297225. > > > > SO 2 years ago, meaning it effects stable/11, > > and may of been merged to stable/10? > Side note: if one has monitoring which does ICMP checks, it will mask the > issue because icmp replies don't use route caching. > Typical story when the observer changes the state of an observed object :-).
Also perhaps why it has not been reported before, as other side effects have caused it to be a pretty invisible issue. > IIRC it was not merged to stable/10. > > > > Do you plan to MFC your fix? > Yes, I do :-) For some reason the MFC: 2 weeks did not register when I read the commit. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
